Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3879292
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T22:42:35+00:00 2026-05-19T22:42:35+00:00

I have used following 2 patterns to create a view. @property (retain, nonatomic) SomeView*

  • 0

I have used following 2 patterns to create a view.

@property (retain, nonatomic) SomeView* someView;

...

// First pattern
self.someView = [[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame frame];

// Second pattern
SomeView* aSomeView = [[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame];
self.someView = aSomeView;
[aSomeView release];

Now, looking back at this code, the first pattern’s method should be changed to

self.someView = [[[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame frame] autorelease];

shouldn’t it?

I feel dumb 🙁

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T22:42:36+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:42 pm

    Look at it like this:

    [[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame: frame];
    

    The above line creates an object and gives it a retain count of 1.

    self.someView = [[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame: frame];
    

    This line leaves it with a retain count of two, because the someView property is declared with retain:

    @property (**retain**, nonatomic) SomeView* someView;
    

    So, doing it this way leaves your someView property pointing to an object with retain count of 2. You can do it this way if you add an autorelease call to it:

    self.someView = [[[SomeView alloc] initWithFrame: frame] autorelease];
    

    Your second pattern is better, if you ask me. You create an object with a retain count of one. You assign it to a retaining property (now it has a retain count of 2) and then you release the original variable, leaving the object again with a retain count of 1. It’s three lines where you might want only one, but it makes sense in the right context. Additionally, it’s usually best to avoid using autorelease outside of an alloc or copy method since its usually an indication you don’t fully understand memory management in Obj-C.

    And as a commenter said in the comments to the question, don’t feel dumb. None of this is intuitive at first. Nobody picks up a guitar and plays like Hendrix their first time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a snippet to create a 'Like' button for our news site: <iframe
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I have a project that adds elements to an AutoCad drawing. I noticed that
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I have several USB mass storage flash drives connected to a Ubuntu Linux computer
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new
I have a login.jsp page which contains a login form. Once logged in the
i have a input tag which is non editable, but some times i need
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.