Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8607717
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T03:25:45+00:00 2026-06-12T03:25:45+00:00

I have void* buffer… I need to encapsulate it as fast as possible in

  • 0

I have void* buffer…
I need to encapsulate it as fast as possible in a NSData structure (NSData or NSMutableData)

I’m guessing using only one NSMutableData (defined in the class) with

- (void)resetBytesInRange:(NSRange)range
- (void)appendBytes:(const void *)bytes length:(NSUInteger)length

or even

- (void)replaceBytesInRange:(NSRange)range withBytes:(const void *)bytes

will be much faster than using [NSData dataWithData:] every function call…

This is for audio process, so it needs to be the fastest it can be.

Does anyone can confirm that i’ll be faster to use NSMutableData instead of NSData constructor ?

EDIT :

the buffer is always the same size, the NSMutableData won’t need to re-allocate memory…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T03:25:46+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 3:25 am

    If you just want to replace the contents of an (already initialized) NSMutableData *data object with new data from buffer of the same length, then the fastest method is probably

    void *mutableBytes = [data mutableBytes];
    memcpy(mutableBytes, buffer, length);
    

    because no range check and no (re-)allocation is done. See also the examples in Working With Mutable Binary Data.

    But of course, as it is often said in this forum, you should profile your app with Instruments to find out where to optimize the program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following data i need to add in the void buffer: MyStruct
I have the following data structure in C: typedef struct { void* buffer; ...
I have a (void*) buffer that I need to convert to std::vector<unsigned char> before
I have code like this: NSData *data = [NSData dataWithContentsOfURL:objURL]; const void *buffer =
I have a function that takes as one of its parameters void* buffer. In
I have the following code: #include <string.h> int main(void) { char *buffer = NULL,
Basically I have void FileReader::parseBuffer(char * buffer, int length) { //start by looking for
I have a file that was encrypted using AES. I use the following NSData
This is the scenario; // I have created a buffer void *buffer = operator
I have HTTP module that compresses HTTP request. public override void Write(byte[] buffer, int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.