Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 793489
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:09:38+00:00 2026-05-14T22:09:38+00:00

I have what I suspect is a malfunctioning wireless access point, the symptom of

  • 0

I have what I suspect is a malfunctioning wireless access point, the symptom of which is that OS X occasionally says ‘your connection may be compromised’ and disconnects for a minute.

As far as I can see by looking at dmesg lines which say

AirPort:  Message Integrity Failure detected (G)

this indicates that some decrypted packet has the wrong value of some cryptographic message-authentication code. It seems very odd to report this as ‘your connection may be compromised’ when it seems much more likely to be due to interference – is there some kind of forward error correction so that interference can be recognised? Should a wifi stack be able to see that the error rate reported by the FEC is high and so produce a less scary message?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:09:39+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:09 pm

    WiFi (all 802.11 variants including the original “802.11”) use forward error correction.

    It appears your message is actually corrupted, either intentionally (depending on the cryptography in use, this could be an attack to cause reauthentication messages), due to buggy firmware, or to gross interference or faulty components. FEC can only correct or detect some level of errors, it can’t guarantee complete detection or error correction (to do so would require an infinite amount of data). The cryptography stack further authenticates these messages using a cryptographic MAC/Digest, which has obviously determined the message does not validate.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following situation in code, which I suspect may be a bit
I have a table with some legacy data that I suspect may be a
I have a question for which I suspect the answer is a bit complex.
I have a question which i suspect is fairly straight forward. I have the
I suspect we have a major memory leak in our ActiveMQ connection bridge -
I have a scenario that i suspect is very common, i've found various ideas
We have a suspect application leaving a connection open. Just wondering on the debugging
I have an application that I suspect might be leaking a thread or its
I have this piece of code in my application. I suspect that it is
I have tried to create one-to-many connection, but it works very strange. I suspect

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.