Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 99143
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T00:19:52+00:00 2026-05-11T00:19:52+00:00

I have written a database application using a binary file as storage. it is

  • 0

I have written a database application using a binary file as storage. it is accessed via powershell cmdlets.

You can put information into the database using the put- and you can read information using get-.

The problem is synchronisation. What is the best way to ensure that the cmdlets don’t access the file at the same time?

The put- must have exclusive access ie no other writers or readers can access the file. The get- doesn’t need exclusive access or readers can access the database at the same time.

Am I best using a file based locking mechanism or a .NET based synchronisation mechanism?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T00:19:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:19 am

    I’m not aware of any .NET-based synchronization mechanisms that would be appropriate here (read on – I’m making an assumption that may not be true).

    If you absolutely must have exclusive access for a ‘put,’ then either (a) file-based locking, or (b) database-based locking might be appropriate. For example, a ‘put’ command might first check a special database field to see if it can gain exclusive access; if it can, it would update that field to show that exclusive access is already taken, preventing another simultaneous put from happening.

    If I’m interpreting your question correctly, there’s a possibility for this database to be accessed by multiple computers, meaning a mutex wouldn’t really work since they’re designed for inter-thread synchronization. If that’s not the case and only a single computer would be accessing the file at any given time, then a mutex would work well.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 89k
  • Answers 89k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Most often, in a child class constructor that require some… May 11, 2026 at 5:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer How about this: instead of calling the delegate method directly,… May 11, 2026 at 5:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer var upgradedUsers = downgradedUsers.Cast<User>(); Append a call to ToArray() if… May 11, 2026 at 5:56 pm

Related Questions

I have a simple blog application written in Python, using Django. I use Git
I have a legacy VB6 application that was built using MSDE. As many client's
Is there an application , which can parse a given set of stored procedures
I am writing an application that logs status updates (GPS locations) from devices to

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.