Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 675847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:51:48+00:00 2026-05-14T00:51:48+00:00

I have written a stored procedure that, yesterday, typically completed in under a second.

  • 0

I have written a stored procedure that, yesterday, typically completed in under a second. Today, it takes about 18 seconds. I ran into the problem yesterday as well, and it seemed to be solved by DROPing and re-CREATEing the stored procedure. Today, that trick doesn’t appear to be working. 🙁

Interestingly, if I copy the body of the stored procedure and execute it as a straightforward query it completes quickly. It seems to be the fact that it’s a stored procedure that’s slowing it down…!

Does anyone know what the problem might be? I’ve searched for answers, but often they recommend running it through Query Analyser, but I don’t have have it – I’m using SQL Server 2008 Express for now.

The stored procedure is as follows;

ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetPOIs]
    @lat1 float,
    @lon1 float,
    @lat2 float,
    @lon2 float,
    @minLOD tinyint, 
    @maxLOD tinyint,
    @exact bit
AS
BEGIN
    -- Create the query rectangle as a polygon
    DECLARE @bounds geography;
    SET @bounds = dbo.fnGetRectangleGeographyFromLatLons(@lat1, @lon1, @lat2, @lon2);

    -- Perform the selection
    if (@exact = 0)
    BEGIN
        SELECT [ID], [Name], [Type], [Data], [MinLOD], [MaxLOD], [Location].[Lat] AS [Latitude], [Location].[Long] AS [Longitude], [SourceID]
        FROM [POIs]
        WHERE
            NOT ((@maxLOD  [MaxLOD])) AND
            (@bounds.Filter([Location]) = 1)
    END
    ELSE
    BEGIN
        SELECT [ID], [Name], [Type], [Data], [MinLOD], [MaxLOD], [Location].[Lat] AS [Latitude], [Location].[Long] AS [Longitude], [SourceID]
        FROM [POIs]
        WHERE
            NOT ((@maxLOD  [MaxLOD])) AND
            (@bounds.STIntersects([Location]) = 1)
    END

END

The ‘POI’ table has an index on MinLOD, MaxLOD, and a spatial index on Location.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:51:48+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:51 am

    Ah, can it be the query plan sucks?

    SP’s get compiled / query plan determined on FIRST USE – depending on parameters. So, the parameters of the first call (when no plan is present) determine the query plan. At one point I gets dropped from cache, new plan generated.

    Next time it runs slow, possibly make a call using query analyzer and get the selected plan – and check how it looks.

    if it is this – put in an option to recompile the SP on every call (with recompile).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a project that adds elements to an AutoCad drawing. I noticed that
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I have several USB mass storage flash drives connected to a Ubuntu Linux computer
I have a snippet to create a 'Like' button for our news site: <iframe
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new
I have a login.jsp page which contains a login form. Once logged in the
i have a input tag which is non editable, but some times i need
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I want to have generalised email templates. Currently I have multiple email templates with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.