Question

I have written some VSTO (2003) code that sucessfully applies some mandatory subject line changes according to attachements of mail items. The code is written to operate on microsoft.office.interop.outlook.mailitem However, I need the same code to operate on other types such as microsoft.office.interop.outlook.appointmentitem for instance(infact it needs to work for anything the user can send that would have a subject).

Assuming the outlook item types have a subject property, an attachments property and a save method, how can I approach writing code that works for all relevant interop.outlook types.

I tried addressing this via reflection but GetProperty is returing null so I can’t use GetValue on it

? mi.GetType().GetProperty("Subject")
null

?(mi as Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.MailItem).Subject
"Test Subject"

there doesn’t seem to be a generic outlookitem class I can cast to, to do this. What’s the correct approach ?

EDIT:
To clarif my code starts like this…

    void Application_ItemSend(object Item, ref bool Cancel) 
    {
            if (Item is Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.MailItem) 
            {
                Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.MailItem currentItem = 
                    Item as Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.MailItem;

then does stuff to currentItem (including passing to to various functions currently typed with Microosft.Office.Interop.Outlook.MailItem properties. I want them to handle “Microsoft.Interop.Outlook.somethingsendable”

Answer 1

That’s not going to work out of the box – AppointmentItem and MailItem are completely different interfaces, so polymorphism is not an option.

The best I can suggest is that you create a SendableItem class of your own to wrap the PIA interfaces you need to support, and encapsulate the switching code there behind a common wrapper for the ‘common’ operations you want to use. You would create a SendableItem using either a MailItem or an AppointmentItem but once created, they look the same from the outside of the SendableItem wrapper.