Home/ Questions/Q 6915095
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-27T09:25:54+00:00

I heard and read that Windows/Linux OS machines are not real-time. I have read

  • 0

I heard and read that Windows/Linux OS machines are not real-time.
I have read this article. It listed WindowsCE is one of RTOS. That’s kind of confusing to me since I always thought WindowsCE is for a mobile or embeded device.

I need a real-time application running 24/7 and processing signals various sensors from each quick moving object to db and monitor by running several machine learning algorithms.

What would be proper real-time hardware and OS for this kind of applications? Development environment would be MFC or Qt C++. I really need opinions from experienced developers. Thanks

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    QNX has served me well in the past. I should warn you that it was only for training purposes (real-time industrial process control), and that I have implemented real time control programs with this OS by I’ve never really deployed one.

    The first rule with real-time systems is to specify your real-time constraints, such as:

    1. the system must be able to process up to 600 signals per minute; or
    2. the system must spend no more than 1/10 second per signal.

    The difference is subtle, but these are different constraints.

    Just keep in mind that there is absolutely no way to decide if any hardward/OS/library combination is good enough for you unless you specify these constraints

    For that, you think QNX might be proper? What would be its advantages over Windows/Linux systems with high priority setting?

    If you look at the QNX documentation for many POSIX systems calls, you will notice they specify extra constraints on performance, which are possibly required to guarantee your real-time constraints. The OS is specifically designed to match these constraints. You won’t get this on a system that is not officially an RTOS. If you are going to write real-time software, I recommend that you buy a good book on the subject. There is considerable literature given that the subject is very sensitive.

    Get yourself a good book on real-time system design to get a feel of what questions to ask, and then read the technical documentation of each product you will use to see if it can match your constraints. Example of things to look in software libraries like Qt is when they allocate memory. If this is not documented in each class interface, there is no way to guarantee meeting your constraints since there is hidden algorithmic complexity.

    Development environment would be MFC or Qt C++.

    I would think that Qt compiles on QNX, but I’m not sure if Qt provides the guarantees required to match your real-time constraints. Libraries that abstract away too much stuff are risk since it’s difficult to determine if they satisfy your requirements. Hidden memory management is often problematic, but there are other questions you should ask about too.

    It seems to me that people say Real-time systems == embedded systems. Am I wrong?

    Real-time system definitely does not equal “embedded system”, though many embedded systems have real-time constraints.

    • 0