Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 231383
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:55:42+00:00 2026-05-11T19:55:42+00:00

I heard from a friend that Microsoft rewrote all the Windows Workflow Foundation (WF)

  • 0

I heard from a friend that Microsoft rewrote all the Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) again and changed everything was in .Net 3.5.

Is that true?

And what about what we learned about WF in 3.0 and 3.5?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:55:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:55 pm

    According to this article:

    http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2009/01/01/windows-workflow-changes-direction.aspx

    Windows Workflow Foundation 4.0 is a “bottom-up rewrite with entirely new thinking…WF 3.0/3.5 will remain part of the framework and will run side by side with WF 4.0. This lets you manage the transition at a time that fits your organization’s broader goals.”

    …which is code for, “We know we just screwed up your programming model, but we have a long term strategy, so we hope you will forgive us.”

    The article goes on to say that

    The gains are enormous: custom
    activities take center stage, and
    authoring them is much simpler;
    workflows are entirely declarative;
    and there are three workflow flow
    styles that you can combine
    seamlessly. It’s possible that you
    could see a 10-fold improvement in the
    time required to create and debug
    workflows, in addition to 10- to
    100-fold runtime performance
    improvements.

    The change is not without its detractors. In this article at DotNetKicks, the author states that “Microsoft is seriously damaging the Dot Net developer community and adoption in the industry with these half baked product releases and abrupt about-faces after shipping.”

    Which is why I generally wait for the 2.0 or 3.0 version of Microsoft technologies, although I made an exception for ASP.NET MVC.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I heard from a friend that asp.net relies on/uses a Windows forms class. I
i have heard from a friend of mine that the best algorithm for swapping
I heard from someone that the maximum array size in .NET is 4 GB?
I've heard from a friend that the WWW-Authenticate header can be explicitly defined within
I heard from a relatively trustworty source that gettext doesn't require system locales for
I have heard from many people that usage of templates make the code slow.
I am new to iphone programming. I heard from few people that even if
I've heard that the term firmware comes from it being between hard ware and
I heard that a private constructor prevents object creation from the outside world. When
I'm remaking windows Minesweeper (from XP) and something they had included was that if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.