Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3789782
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T12:12:41+00:00 2026-05-19T12:12:41+00:00

I just came across some code which declares a struct within a C++ class

  • 0

I just came across some code which declares a struct within a C++ class as follows:

struct T 
{
       int data;
       T* next;
} array[0];

What does this kind of declaration do? What effect does putting “array[0]” at the end of the struct defintion have?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T12:12:42+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 12:12 pm

    Ahh, it’s almost a “flexible array member”.

    It was formalized in C99, but it’s an old C trick that creates a dynamic array. Allocate more memory for the object and you can store more elements in the array.

    I think the use of a specific 0 there is a compromise, as actual [] flexible arrays were not in C89 or C++. The more canonical legacy use of this pattern is ...[1].

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I came across some sample code in VB.Net which I have some experience with
I just came across this idiom in some open-source Python, and I choked on
I just came across an interesting situation in JavaScript. I have a class with
I just came across this code and a few Google searches turn up no
We recently came across some sample code from a vendor for hashing a secret
So while rewriting some code, I came across something along the lines of: Method
Just came across this quote in a book on OOP that I'm reading, A
Just came across this website . Feature 9 is memory management and they claim
I just came across this question about initializing local variables. Many of the answers
I just came across the question - is the access of an object safely

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.