Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3405202
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T05:28:36+00:00 2026-05-18T05:28:36+00:00

I just came across this here , always used like this: if string1.find(string2) <>

  • 0

I just came across this here, always used like this:

if string1.find(string2) <> -1:
    pass

What does the <> operator do, and why not use the usual == or in?

Sorry if that has been answered before, search engines don’t like punctuation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T05:28:37+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 5:28 am

    http://docs.python.org/reference/expressions.html#notin says:

    The [operators] <> and != are equivalent; for consistency with C, != is preferred. […] The <> spelling is considered obsolescent.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just came across a place where I'd like to use generics and I'm not
Just came across this quote in a book on OOP that I'm reading, A
Just came across this website . Feature 9 is memory management and they claim
I just came across this code and a few Google searches turn up no
I just came across this question about initializing local variables. Many of the answers
I just came across this idiom in some open-source Python, and I choked on
I just came across a C++ SDK that makes heavy use of this really
I was just reading through Learning Python by Mark Lutz and came across this
I've never came across an app/class like Zend Search Lucene before, as I've always
I just got my copy of Expert F# 2.0 and came across this statement,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.