Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6815541
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T20:49:11+00:00 2026-05-26T20:49:11+00:00

I just discovered that the following code executes without error (Chrome): console.log(fa); function fa(){}

  • 0

I just discovered that the following code executes without error (Chrome):

console.log(fa);
function fa(){}

I was under the impression that:

function fa(){}

was identical to:

var fa = function(){};

My assumption had led me to believe that my code block above should have resulted in an error due to fa not having been declared before it was called. The second form however, when used in my code sample above, will produce an error because fa has not been defined yet when the first line runs.

Is there some documentation or information somewhere that covers the fact that the function keyword, when used declaratively, is preparsed, thus exposing said function in advance of the actual order of operation of the lines of code in a script?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T20:49:12+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:49 pm

    The following

    function fa(){}
    

    is a function declaration which declares function fa, while

    var fa = function(){};
    

    declares a variable fa and initializes it with the result of a function expression. In JavaScript identifiers declared in a scope are hoisted to the top of the scope and hence are available throughout the scope. Initializers however are still executed in the place in the code where they appear.

    Now, your function expression is executed (as any other initializer would be) at the point where it is placed in the code. Until the initializer is executed the variable holds undefined as its value.

    Function declaration, on the other hand, is hoisted to the top of the scope as a whole together with the identifier under which the function is declared. Hence fa produced by the function declaration stores the right function object even when inspected above the place where the function declaration occurs.

    fa1(); // valid
    fa2(); // error, fa2 is undefined, not a function
    
    function fa1() {}
    var fa2 = function() {};
    
    fa1(); // valid
    fa2(); // valid
    

    See this for more on scoping and hoisting in JavaScript.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've just discovered that Oracle lets you do the following: SELECT foo.a, (SELECT c
i just discovered http://code.google.com/p/re2 , a promising library that uses a long-neglected way (
I've discovered that the following code: public static class MimeHelper { public static string
To my amazement I just discovered that the C99 stdint.h is missing from MS
I have just discovered that if generating assemblies via Reflection.Emit, the .NET framework keeps
I've just discovered that regtlib.exe appears to be missing from Windows 7 (and apparently
I have a website, and I just discovered that somehow someone injected JavaScript on
I only just recently discovered that Visual C++ 2008 (and perhaps earlier versions as
I have just discovered a variable name that is misspelled. If it were hidden
I just discovered, quite by accident, that this seems to work: Public Interface Ix

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.