Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 473071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T00:09:00+00:00 2026-05-13T00:09:00+00:00

I just found a TestNG test case that uses Spring to provide its data

  • 0

I just found a TestNG test case that uses Spring to provide its data source. As a result the code is quite clean and concise.

However, I need to expand the test cases so they can take a variable list of inputs.

Am I stuck using bean references for the list of lists as I’ve attempted below? Is there a way to do that and still be pretty (i.e. not breaking up the logical flow of input followed by output)? Is there a better way?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">

    <bean id="stringPatternRegexMap" class="java.util.HashMap">
        <constructor-arg>
            <map>
                <entry key="some input #1" value="expected output #1"/>
                <entry key="some input #2" value="expected output #2"/>
                <entry key="some input #3" value="expected output #3"/>
                <entry key-ref="multi-list-1" value="expected output #3"/>
                <entry key-ref="null-reference" value="null-reference"/>
            </map>
        </constructor-arg>
    </bean>

    <bean id="multi-list-1">
            <list>
                    <value>apple</value>
                    <value>banana</value>
                    <value>orange</value>
            </list>
    </bean>

    <bean id="null-reference">
            <value>
                    <null/>
            </value>
    </bean>
</beans>

Note that the original code appears to be using a map instead of a list because it seems an easier way to provide a list of String[2].

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T00:09:00+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:09 am

    No, you can use a @DataProvider to feed a test methods with a variable number of parameters:

      @DataProvider
      public Object[][] dp() {
        return new Object[][] {
            new Object[] { new Object[] { "a" } },
            new Object[] { new Object[] { "b", "c" } },
        };
      }
    
      @Test(dataProvider = "dp")
      public void g1(Object... params) {
        System.out.println("Received " + params.length + " parameters");
      }
    

    will print:

    Received 1 parameters
    Received 2 parameters
    

    Note that your test method can declare either “Object…” or “Object[]” (it’s the same to the compiler).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just found myself creating a class called InstructionBuilderFactoryMapFactory. That's 4 pattern suffixes on
I just found out that by converting PNG32 to PNG8 via Photoshop will fix
I just found this in some old code, and I'm not sure what it
I just found out that my program is losing 5% execution speed when it
I’ve just found out that the execution plan performance between the following two select
I've just found IPython and I can report that I'm in deep love. And
I just found in the documentation that FloatToStr and DateToStr are not thread-safe in
Just attempting this question I found in a past exam paper so that I
Just found this out, so i am answering my own question :) Use a
I just found /n softwares free Powershell NetCmdlets, and after playing with them I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.