Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4600642
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T23:42:47+00:00 2026-05-21T23:42:47+00:00

I just found out that the following (awesome) syntax is accepted by Firefox f

  • 0

I just found out that the following (awesome) syntax is accepted by Firefox

f = function(x) x+1;
f(17) //gives 18

Does anyone know what the hell is going on here? Is this in any standard? Do other browsers also accept it? (I tested IE 8 and it gave me syntax error)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T23:42:48+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 11:42 pm

    This isn’t part of a standard. The documentation is at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/New_in_JavaScript_1.8#Expression_closures_%28Merge_into_own_page.2fsection%29

    There’s discussion about adding some syntax along these lines or even shorter to the standard. See http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:shorter_function_syntax

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I’ve just found out that the execution plan performance between the following two select
following up on this question I made before, I just found out that it
Just found out that the video output of the iPad is not a system
I just found out that every time onclick event for my <button> placed inside
I just found out that in FF, if you are dynamically creating an OPTION
I just found out that lazy loading in Entity Framework only works from the
I've just found out that there is a possibility to host a Windows Forms
I have an interview tomorrow morning and just found out that I will also
Just have read sass changelog and found out that FSSM (the gem that had
Scheme relative URLs (network-path references) are something that I've just found out about -

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.