Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 518967
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:59:31+00:00 2026-05-13T07:59:31+00:00

I just got a seg fault in overloading the assignment operator for a class

  • 0

I just got a seg fault in overloading the assignment operator for a class FeatureRandomCounts, which has _rects as its pointer member pointing to an array of FeatureCount and size rhs._dim, and whose other date members are non-pointers:

FeatureRandomCounts &  FeatureRandomCounts::operator=(const FeatureRandomCounts &rhs)  
{  
  if (_rects) delete [] _rects;  

  *this = rhs;  // segment fault

  _rects = new FeatureCount [rhs._dim];  
  for (int i = 0; i < rhs._dim; i++)  
  {  
    _rects[i]=rhs._rects[i];  
  }  

  return *this;    
}

Does someone have some clue? Thanks and regards!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:59:31+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:59 am

    As mentioned, you have infinite recursion; however, to add to that, here’s a foolproof way to implement op=:

    struct T {
      T(T const& other);
      T& operator=(T copy) {
        swap(*this, copy);
        return *this;
      }
      friend void swap(T& a, T& b);
    };
    

    Write a correct copy ctor and swap, and exception safety and all edge cases are handled for you!

    The copy parameter is passed by value and then changed. Any resources which the current instance must destroy are handled when copy is destroyed. This follows current recommendations and handles self-assignment cleanly.


    #include <algorithm>
    #include <iostream>
    
    struct ConcreteExample {
      int* p;
      std::string s;
    
      ConcreteExample(int n, char const* s) : p(new int(n)), s(s) {}
      ConcreteExample(ConcreteExample const& other)
      : p(new int(*other.p)), s(other.s) {}
      ~ConcreteExample() { delete p; }
    
      ConcreteExample& operator=(ConcreteExample copy) {
        swap(*this, copy);
        return *this;
      }
    
      friend void swap(ConcreteExample& a, ConcreteExample& b) {
        using std::swap;
        //using boost::swap; // if available
        swap(a.p, b.p); // uses ADL (when p has a different type), the whole reason
        swap(a.s, b.s); // this 'method' is not really a member (so it can be used
                        // the same way)
      }
    };
    
    int main() {
      ConcreteExample a (3, "a"), b (5, "b");
      std::cout << a.s << *a.p << ' ' << b.s << *b.p << '\n';
      a = b;
      std::cout << a.s << *a.p << ' ' << b.s << *b.p << '\n';
      return 0;
    }
    

    Notice it works with either manually managed members (p) or RAII/SBRM-style members (s).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.