Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 838535
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T05:19:14+00:00 2026-05-15T05:19:14+00:00

I just had a little surprise in a Webapp, where I’m using EL in

  • 0

I just had a little surprise in a Webapp, where I’m using EL in .jsp pages.

I added a boolean property and scratched my head because I had named a boolean “isDynamic”, so I could write this:

<c:if test="${page.isDynamic}">
   ...
</c:if>

Which I find easier to read than:

<c:if test="${page.dynamic}">
   ...
</c:if>

However the .jsp failed to compile, with the error:

javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: Property 'isDynamic' not found on type com...

I turns out my IDE (and it took me some time to notice it), when generating the getter, had generated a method called:

isDynamic()

instead of:

getIsDynamic()

Once I manually replaced isDynamic() by getIsDynamic() everything was working fine.

So I’ve got really two questions here:

  1. is it bad to start a boolean property’s name with “is”?

  2. wether it is bad or not, didn’t IntelliJ made a mistake here by auto-generating a method named isDynamic instead of getIsDynamic?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T05:19:14+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:19 am
    1. Sensitive subject, but in my opinion it is bad. The variable name should not denote a question, but a statement. E.g. pageIsDynamic, dynamical or dynamicallyGenerated. There is however no clear coding convention for this. As long as you’re consistent throughout the coding, either way won’t harm that much.

    2. No, it didn’t. The Javabean specification states that it is allowed to prefix boolean getter method names with is as well. It is usually preferred above get. As every other decent IDE, IntellIJ just adheres this specification. Eclipse and Netbeans would do the same. Here’s an extract of chapter 8.3.2:

    8.3.2 Boolean properties

    In addition, for boolean properties, we allow a getter method to match the pattern:

    public boolean is<PropertyName>();
    

    This “is<PropertyName>” method may be provided instead of a “get<PropertyName>” method,
    or it may be provided in addition to a “get<PropertyName>” method.

    In either case, if the “is<PropertyName>” method is present for a boolean property then we will use the “is<PropertyName>” method to read the property value.
    An example boolean property might be:

    public boolean isMarsupial();
    public void setMarsupial(boolean m);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just had a discussion at work about the merits of using PostgreSQL over MySQL
Mary had a little form, and its fields where labeled just so. Whenever an
I recently had a little problem using a jquery plugin with coffeescript (within the
just had a general question about how to approach a certain problem I'm facing.
I just had an idea, is that possible to protect my java sources (packed
I just had an interesting experience with a startup form in MS Access 2010.
I just had the jQuery epiphany the other day and still feel like there
I just had a quick question about git - how backwards compatible are git
I just had a ridonkulous typo in my iPhone app, answered here . Now
I just had a question about aligning two expand-collapse boxes and got an answer

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.