Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1044677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T15:51:56+00:00 2026-05-16T15:51:56+00:00

I just know that the non-primitives (the objects) go on the heap, and methods

  • 0

I just know that the non-primitives (the objects) go on the heap, and methods go on the stack, but what about the primitive variables?

–update

Based on the answers, I could say the heap can have a new stack and heap for a given object? Given that the object will have primitive and reference variables..?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T15:51:57+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 3:51 pm

    Primitives defined locally would be on the stack. However if a primitive were defined as part of an instance of an object, that primitive would be on the heap.

    public class Test {
        private static class HeapClass {
            public int y; // When an instance of HeapClass is allocated, this will be on the heap.
        }
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            int x=1; // This is on the stack.
        }
    }
    

    With regards to the update:

    Objects do not have their own stack. In my example, int y would actually be part of each instance of HeapClass. Whenever an instance of HeapClass is allocated (e.g. new Test.HeapClass()), all member variables of HeapClass are added to the heap. Thus, since instances of HeapClass are being allocated on the heap, int y would be on the heap as part of an instance of HeapClass.

    However, all primitive variables declared in the body of any method would be on the stack.

    As you can see in the above example, int x is on the stack because it is declared in a method body–not as a member of a class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.