Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 515871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:40:22+00:00 2026-05-13T07:40:22+00:00

I just read a few threads on the discussion of singleton design in javascript.

  • 0

I just read a few threads on the discussion of singleton design in javascript. I’m 100% new to the Design Pattern stuff but as I see since a Singleton by definition won’t have the need to be instantiated, conceptually if it’s not to be instantiated, in my opinion it doesn’t have to be treated like conventional objects which are created from a blueprint(classes). So my wonder is why not just think of a singleton just as something statically available that is wrapped in some sort of scope and that should be all.

From the threads I saw, most of them make a singleton though traditional javascript

new function(){} 

followed by making a pseudo constructor.

Well I just think an object literal is enough enough:

var singleton = {
   dothis: function(){},
   dothat: function(){}
}

right? Or anybody got better insights?

[update] : Again my point is why don’t people just use a simpler way to make singletons in javascript as I showed in the second snippet, if there’s an absolute reason please tell me. I’m usually afraid of this kind of situation that I simplify things to much 😀

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:40:23+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:40 am

    I agree with you, the simplest way is to use a object literal, but if you want private members, you could implement taking advantage of closures:

    var myInstance = (function() {
      var privateVar;
    
      function privateMethod () {
        // ...
      }
    
      return { // public interface
        publicMethod1: function () {
          // private members can be accessed here
        },
        publicMethod2: function () {
          // ...
        }
      };
    })();
    

    About the new function(){} construct, it will simply use an anonymous function as a constructor function, the context inside that function will be a new object that will be returned.

    Edit: In response to the @J5’s comment, that is simple to do, actually I think that this can be a nice example for using a Lazy Function Definition pattern:

    function singleton() {
      var instance = (function() {
        var privateVar;
    
        function privateMethod () {
          // ...
        }
    
        return { // public interface
          publicMethod1: function () {
              // private members can be accessed here
           },
          publicMethod2: function () {
            // ...
          }
        };
      })();
    
      singleton = function () { // re-define the function for subsequent calls
        return instance;
      };
    
      return singleton(); // call the new function
    }
    

    When the function is called the first time, I make the object instance, and reassign singleton to a new function which has that object instance in it’s closure.

    Before the end of the first time call I execute the re-defined singleton function that will return the created instance.

    Following calls to the singleton function will simply return the instance that is stored in it’s closure, because the new function is the one that will be executed.

    You can prove that by comparing the object returned:

    singleton() == singleton(); // true
    

    The == operator for objects will return true only if the object reference of both operands is the same, it will return false even if the objects are identical but they are two different instances:

    ({}) == ({}); // false
    new Object() == new Object(); // false
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 368k
  • Answers 368k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, there are two versions of sgen.exe available, one for… May 14, 2026 at 5:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First of all, you shouldn't be using Dev-C++. If you… May 14, 2026 at 5:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Calling ToLower() doesn't do anything by itself. Strings are immutable,… May 14, 2026 at 5:05 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.