Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8745811
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T12:05:45+00:00 2026-06-13T12:05:45+00:00

I just spent several hours debugging some R code, only to discover that the

  • 0

I just spent several hours debugging some R code, only to discover that the error was due to an Inf that had sneaked in during my calculations. I had checked for NA, but hadn’t thought to check for Inf.

I wrote the following function to help prevent this situation in the future:

is.bad <- function(x){
  is.na(x) | is.nan(x) | is.infinite(x)
}

>     is.bad(c(NA, NaN, Inf, -Inf, 0, 1, 1000, 1e6))
[1]  TRUE  TRUE  TRUE  TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Are there any other special data types in R I should be aware of?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T12:05:46+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 12:05 pm

    !is.finite(x) is equivalent to your is.bad(x); it detects Inf (and -Inf), NA, and NaN values.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just spent several hours of my life debugging this problem. I'm documenting it
Just spent several hours writing up for a new site... looks great in my
I just spent 5 hours by checking Google gadgets websites and FAQs, but I
Perhaps I'm over-looking some minor error somewhere, however I have spent 20 minutes staring
This afternoon I spent several hours trying to find a bug in my custom
I have spent the last several hours scouring the internet looking for examples and
Okay, I've spent several hours on this problem and I'm not sure what's going
So I've spent several hours now working through the scant amount of information available
I just spent way too long trying to diagnose why, in the following snippet
I just spent around an hour implementing the android market licencing tools into my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.