Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1011359
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T09:13:17+00:00 2026-05-16T09:13:17+00:00

I just started studying C++, and I met this new guy: ->. I was

  • 0

I just started studying C++, and I met this new guy: ->. I was wondering if it means something different than (.) or not, and if it does, what it is.

Can you answer that? I looked for it a bit, but I didn´t find anything to answer my question.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T09:13:18+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:13 am

    If you start with a pointer to an object, use ->. If you start with a reference or direct value of class type, use .. If you use the wrong one, the compiler should give a pretty clear error message.

    a->b is defined to be synonymous with (*a).b.

    Except in the case of operator overloading, in which case -> and * must be overloaded separately, and . cannot be overloaded.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Sorry if this question is too simple or easy. I just started studying Delegates
Just started designing a database which I have not done before. And am wondering
I just started to learn Ruby and as a .Net developer, I'm wondering if
I just started studying Drupal 7 and learned how powerful CCK and Views are.
I download asp.net mvc2 preview 2 days back. I've just started studying MVC. I
I don't want to download Visual Studio 2010. How can I start studying (not
I have just started studying OOP and I am a little confused of the
Just started learning C# (in xaml), so appreciate some elaboration: ((MSAvalon.Windows.Serialization.ILoaded)(_Text_2_)).DeferLoad(); Not sure what
I just started studying programming about 6 months ago and I have really been
Just started learning C from Cocoa developing guide and I was wondering how (if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.