Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1085063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T22:38:27+00:00 2026-05-16T22:38:27+00:00

I just started using Boost::xpressive and find it an excellent library… I went through

  • 0

I just started using Boost::xpressive and find it an excellent library… I went through the documentation and tried to use the ! operator (zero or one) but it doesn’t compile (VS2008).

I want to match a sip address which may or may not start with “sip:”

#include <iostream>
#include <boost/xpressive/xpressive.hpp>

using namespace boost::xpressive;
using namespace std;
int main()
{


    sregex re = !"sip:" >> *(_w | '.') >> '@' >> *(_w | '.');

    smatch what;
    for(;;)
    {
        string input;
        cin >> input;

        if(regex_match(input, what, re))
        {
            cout << "match!\n";
        }
    }

    return 0;
}`
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T22:38:28+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:38 pm

    You just encountered a bug that plagues most of the DSEL.

    The issue is that you want a specific operator to be called, the one actually defined in your specific languages. However this operator already exist in C++, and therefore the normal rules of Lookup and Overload resolution apply.

    The selection of the right operator is done with ADL (Argument Dependent Lookup), which means that at least one of the objects on which the operator apply should be part of the DSEL itself.

    For example, consider this simple code snippet:

    namespace dsel
    {
      class MyObject;
      class MyStream;
      MyStream operator<<(std::ostream&, MyObject);
    }
    
    int main(int, char*[])
    {
      std::cout << MyObject() << "other things here";
    }
    

    Because the expression is evaluated from left to right, the presence of dsel::MyObject is viral, ie the dsel will here be propagated.

    Regarding Xpressive, most of the times it works because you use special “markers” that are Xpressive type instances like (_w) or because of the viral effect (for example “@” works because the expression on the left of >> is Xpressive-related).

    Were you to use:

    sregex re = "sip:" >> *(_w | '.') >> '@' >> *(_w | '.');
                ^^^^^^ ~~ ^^^^^^^^^^^
                Regular    Xpressive
    

    It would work, because the right hand-side argument is “contaminated” by Xpressive thanks to the precedence rules of the operators.

    However here operator! has one of the highest precedence. At such, its scope is restricted to:

    `!"sip:"`
    

    And since "sip:" is of type char const[5], it just invokes the regular operator! which will rightly conclude that the expression to which it applies is true and thus evaluate to the bool value false.

    By using as_xpr, you convert the C-string into an Xpressive object, and thus bring in the right operator! from the Xpressive namespace into consideration, and overload resolution kicks in appropriately.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have just started using Boost 1.36. These libraries would be very useful in
Have just started using Google Chrome , and noticed in parts of our site,
Have just started using Visual Studio Professional's built-in unit testing features, which as I
I just started using GNU Emacs as my text editor and I am concerned
I just started using the WPF WebBrowser that is included in Net 3.5 SP1.
I just started using SVN, and I have a cache directory that I don't
I just started using CCNet, and in the process of getting my build projects
I just started using TestDriven.NET to debug on my tests, here is my setup
I've just started using the MVP pattern in the large ASP.NET application that I'm
We've just started using LINQ to SQL at work for our DAL & we

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.