Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 372621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:13:43+00:00 2026-05-12T14:13:43+00:00

I know about covariance, and I know that in general it will not be

  • 0

I know about covariance, and I know that in general it will not be possible in C# until v4.0.

However I am wondering about a specific case. Is there some way of getting converting IQueryable<Derived> to IQueryable<Base> by somehow creating a wrapper class that does not actually perform a query, but can actually “pass through” a .Where<>() call?

My use case is that I am trying to deal with a database schema that has many similar tables. Most of the fields are in common, and many of the common fields need to be queried on each table. I’m using LinqToSql. I was hoping to avoid duplicating all the queries for each table.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:13:43+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:13 pm

    Is the following what you are looking for?

    var results = queryable.OfType<Base>.Where(...);
    

    The OfType method will gather up anything that is of the specified type, and if all items in the collection are either of type Base, or derived from type base, they should qualify. In the subsequent where, all items would be of type Base.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 252k
  • Answers 252k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The autoloading mechanism works exactly the same way with static… May 13, 2026 at 9:46 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not a good idea, a virtual machine shouldn't… May 13, 2026 at 9:46 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It depends on the view technology in question. In JSP… May 13, 2026 at 9:46 am

Related Questions

first of all let me say that I know about dynamic, no PIA, named
I'm considering porting a very simple text-templating library to scala, mostly as an exercise
I didn't attend PDC 2008, but I heard some news that C# 4.0 is
Is there ever a reason to use Type parameters over generics, ie: // this...

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.