Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 166411
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:05:35+00:00 2026-05-11T12:05:35+00:00

I know about the __add__ method to override plus, but when I use that

  • 0

I know about the __add__ method to override plus, but when I use that to override +=, I end up with one of two problems:

  1. if __add__ mutates self, then

    z = x + y 

    will mutate x when I don’t really want x to be mutated there.

  2. if __add__ returns a new object, then

    tmp = z z += x z += y tmp += w return z 

    will return something without w since z and tmp point to different objects after z += x is executed.

I can make some sort of .append() method, but I’d prefer to overload += if it is possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:05:36+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:05 pm

    Yes. Just override the object’s __iadd__ method, which takes the same parameters as add. You can find more information here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know about SortedSet , but in my case I need something that implements
I know about Application.Exit() but what if I'm not in a windows forms application
I know about the HIG (which is quite handy!), but what programming practices do
I know about code-behind files, but what is the best real-world way of Designers
I know about using a -vsdoc.js file for IntelliSense , and the one for
All I know about the constraint is it's name ( SYS_C003415 ), but I
In C I know about the recursive function but I heard about the re-entrant
I know about this question: Which (third-party) debug visualizers for Visual Studio 2005/2008 do
I know about the buttonMode property on a MovieClip (to get the hand cursor
I need to know about Epoll On linux System. Could you recommend manual or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.