Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 758801
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T15:31:22+00:00 2026-05-14T15:31:22+00:00

I know all about this exception, read the msdn article here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312629/EN-US/ but I

  • 0

I know all about this exception, read the msdn article here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312629/EN-US/ but I do not know how to handle this when my boss does not want me to throw in false for the Response.End.

Here’s what I have:

        else 
        {
 try
 {
  VoidlOrder(transactionID);
 }
 catch (Exception ex)
 {
  LogError(ex.ToString());
 }
 finally
 {
     RedirectUser(sessionID,"showfmsg=1", true);
 }
        }

RedirectUser is just a utility method we run that ultimately passes in true for the reponse.redirect resopnse.end param.

So what other option is there other than putting false as this param? He’s stating to catch it and do something…ok do what? I don’t see any other fix than to send false into this call every time because I can’t get pass this exception..I get it every time.

UPDATED

tried this but I still get a threadabortexception in the outer catch:

          else 
        {
                try
                {

                    VoidOrder(transactionID);
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                    LogError(ex.ToString());
                }
                finally
                {
                    try
                    {
                    RedirectUserBackToCheckout(sessionID, "showfmsg=1", true);
                    }
                    catch (ThreadAbortException)
                    {

                    }

                }
        }
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        // some other logic
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T15:31:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:31 pm

    Your question doesn’t make sense, but you’re probably looking for

    catch(ThreadAbortException) { Thread.ResetAbort(); }
    

    EDIT: You need to call Thread.ResetAbort(); in your catch block.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm talking about the performance increase here. From all I know you can echo
We all know about Boost . What other free C++ libraries are worth using?
We all know about techniques to prevent db deadlocks - acquire locks in the
The point of M-V-VM as we all know is about speraration of concerns. In
I don't know very much about sockets at all. What I am wondering is
I know I could just make all the Mix_Musics public, and not worry about
I know that there has to be quite a lot of documentation about this
I've googled about this all over the Internet and still haven't found a solution.
OK so I have read a fair amount about SQL Server's locking stuff, but
Sorry if this has been covered, but I about to pull my hair out.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.