Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1110205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T02:21:34+00:00 2026-05-17T02:21:34+00:00

I know I can make a method like private T MyFun<T>() where T :

  • 0

I know I can make a method like

private T MyFun<T>() 
  where T : IMyInterface
{...}

Can I do the reverse, i.e. where T does not implement IMyInterface? The specific use case is that I don’t want to allow nullables, but I’m curious just in general.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T02:21:34+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:21 am

    No, in the general case you cannot specify an “exclusion list”. However, to prevent Nullable types from being allowed, you can use the “where T : class” constraint. Because Nullable is a struct, that will have the desired effect.

    Edit: Oops, it appears that I was too hasty – were you asking how to prevent anything that can be null, or specifically Nullable, from being allowed?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a snippet to create a 'Like' button for our news site: <iframe
I need to solve the following question which i can't get to work by
I know its probably possible, but is it practical and doable to try and
I know its probably possible, but is it practical and doable to try and
I need to develop a file indexing application in python and wanted to know
I would like to remove/delete a migration file. How would I go about doing
After having read Ian Boyd 's constructor series questions ( 1 , 2 ,
I'm doing some changes on my routes, and suddenly the following is appearing in
I have several USB mass storage flash drives connected to a Ubuntu Linux computer
I have a login.jsp page which contains a login form. Once logged in the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.