Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6375997
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T01:41:16+00:00 2026-05-25T01:41:16+00:00

I know it is possible to overload operators that already exist in c++ to

  • 0

I know it is possible to overload operators that already exist in c++ to define desired behavior, but is it possible to create your own operator?

Just for example, making an operator # that returns the size of containers:

template<typename T>
size_t operator#(const T& obj) { return obj.size(); }

vector<int> v(1024);
cout << #v; // prints 1024
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T01:41:17+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:41 am

    No. You need to stick with the operators the parser already knows how to handle. Overloading can extend the meaning of expressions, but the syntax is fixed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know it's not possible to overload operators in as3, and have been using
Is it possible to overload the new operator so that an object isn't created,
Is it possible to overload operators in such a way that you can capture
I know its possible to receive a dayClick event on Fullcalendar. But I would
Of course I know is possible to create a file with a certain size
I know it's possible, and I've seen simple examples in the documentation, but are
Possible Duplicate: How do I overload the square-bracket operator in C#? Basically I want
I know you can overload an existing operator. I want to know if it
I know you can overload the operator new . When you do, you method
Possible Duplicate: Overloading += in c++ Do I need to overload the += operator

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.