Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 834201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:38:19+00:00 2026-05-15T04:38:19+00:00

I know it is quite some weird goal here but for a quick and

  • 0

I know it is quite some weird goal here but for a quick and dirty fix for one of our system we do need to not filter any input and let the corruption go into the system.

My current regex for this is “\^.*“

The problem with that is that it does not match characters as planned … but for one match it does work. The string that make it not work is ^@jj (basically anything that has ^ … ).

What would be the best way to not match any characters now ? I was thinking of removing the \  but only doing this will transform the “not” into a “start with” …

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:38:20+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:38 am

    The ^ character doesn’t mean “not” except inside a character class ([]). If you want to not match anything, you could use a negative lookahead that matches anything: (?!.*).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some really weird crash here, ive got it before, but i thought
Ok, I've got a weird one here. I know the value is being passed
I know this is quite a ridiculous question but this is quite confusing and
I know it is quite subjective, but I also want to take this opportunity
I have the following code (Yes I know it's quite long winded, but I
There are already quite some posts about the Singleton-Pattern around, but I would like
I know this is rather basic, and i've searched for answers for quite some
This may seem quite a weird question but I'm quite confused right now and
This might be crazy but it intriguing me for quite some time :) I
Bit of a weird one - bound to see some head scratching and wrinkled

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.