Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1074171
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T21:05:12+00:00 2026-05-16T21:05:12+00:00

I know it’s ridiculous, but I need it for storage optimization. Is there any

  • 0

I know it’s ridiculous, but I need it for storage optimization. Is there any good way to implement it in C++?

It has to be flexible enough so that I can use it as a normal data type e.g Vector< int20 >, operator overloading, etc..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T21:05:12+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:05 pm

    If storage is your main concern, I suspect you need quite a few 20-bit variables. How about storing them in pairs? You could create a class representing two such variables and store them in 2.5+2.5 = 5 bytes.

    To access the variables conveniently you could override the []-operator so you could write:

    int fst = pair[0];
    int snd = pair[1];
    

    Since you may want to allow for manipulations such as

    pair[1] += 5;
    

    you would not want to return a copy of the backing bytes, but a reference. However, you can’t return a direct reference to the backing bytes (since it would mess up it’s neighboring value), so you’d actually need to return a proxy for the backing bytes (which in turn has a reference to the backing bytes) and let the proxy overload the relevant operators.

    As a metter of fact, as @Tony suggest, you could generalize this to have a general container holding N such 20-bit variables.

    (I’ve done this myself in a specialization of a vector for efficient storage of booleans (as single bits).)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Know of any good libraries for this? I did some searches and didn't come
I know there is a registry key indicating the install directory, but I don't
I know Microsoft has made efforts in the direction of semantic and cross-browser compliant
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know this might be a no-brainer, but please read on. I also know
I know, I would have thought the answer was obviously no as well, but
I know I must be missing something, but in a while statement how does
Know of an OCAML/CAML IDE? Especially one that runs on Linux?
I know in certain circumstances, such as long running processes, it is important to
Anyone know if it's possible to databind the ScaleX and ScaleY of a render

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.