Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9320347
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 19, 20262026-06-19T03:36:47+00:00 2026-06-19T03:36:47+00:00

I know netty uses the Reactor pattern to avoid creating a thread for each

  • 0

I know netty uses the Reactor pattern to avoid creating a thread for each connection,
the core concept about this pattern is a “selector” or epoll system call in Linux.

But I also heard about that if a handler never close it’s channel, it will occupy one worker thread and block it: doesn’t that mean each connetion will use (block) one thread,so for each accepted socket we still need to create a thread ?

for example ,if I write a server with 10,000 persistent connections,does this server need 10,000 worker threads??

The contradiction between those two things above confused me ,can anyone explain me if I understand it wrong? thank you~

========================================

an example (with only 1 worker thread ) which can always process one client’s event in the same time.

import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import org.jboss.netty.bootstrap.ServerBootstrap;
import org.jboss.netty.buffer.ChannelBuffer;
import org.jboss.netty.channel.*;
import org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioServerSocketChannelFactory;
public class Netty_test {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ChannelFactory factory =new     NioServerSocketChannelFactory(Executors.newCachedThreadPool(),Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1));
    ServerBootstrap bootstrap = new ServerBootstrap(factory);
        ChannelPipelineFactory cpf=new ChannelPipelineFactory(){
            public ChannelPipeline getPipeline() {
                return Channels.pipeline(new testHandler());
            }
        };
        bootstrap.setPipelineFactory(cpf);
        bootstrap.setOption("child.tcpNoDelay", true);      
        bootstrap.bind(new InetSocketAddress(100));
    }
}
class testHandler extends SimpleChannelHandler {
@Override
    public void messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent e) {    
        System.out.println("messageReceived, handler work.");
        e.getChannel().write(e.getMessage());
        ctx.sendUpstream(e);
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-19T03:36:49+00:00Added an answer on June 19, 2026 at 3:36 am

    No, your 10,000 connections will share the worker threads. One worker thread will handle multiple connections/channels. This is why it is very important not to block the worker threads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Know this might be rather basic, but I been trying to figure out how
I know you can not set a key value dynamically, but what about the
I know that this sort of question has been asked here before, but still
i know this is a stupid question but i d'ont know how to do
I know how to do this with jQuery, but I want to learn it
I know how you can disable all NSLog messages from answers like this one
I know this surfaced many times, like in this or this question, and it
Has anyone ever gotten this error or know what it relates to? I got
know question is not clear at a glance, i have this table: ID Start
Is this possible? I know the code below looks a whole heap of mess

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.