Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 353369
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:49:25+00:00 2026-05-12T11:49:25+00:00

I know of the ||= operator, but don’t think it’ll help me here…trying to

  • 0

I know of the ||= operator, but don’t think it’ll help me here…trying to create an array that counts the number of “types” among an array of objects.

array.each do |c|
  newarray[c.type] = newarray[c.type] ? newarray[c.type]+1 ? 0
end

Is there a more graceful way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:49:26+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:49 am
    types = Hash.new(-1) # It feels like this should be 0, but to be
                         # equivalent to your example it needs to be -1
    array.each do |c|
      types[c.type] += 1
    end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: C++ Comma Operator that probably a trivial question, but I don't know
I know that we can't overload operator with other meaning, we can't create new
I must write operator overloading += but I don't know how to do it
I know the difference between the points-to (->) and dot (.) operator but I
I know that we cant use assignment operator in if statements in java as
So I know that C++ has an Operator Precedence and that int x =
I've got a simple class Currency with overloaded operator<<. I don't know how can
I have heard the term 'list difference' (\\) operator in Haskell but still don't
I'm sure this has already been answered somewhere, but I don't know what to
I don't know if this has been asked here. I saw couple of questions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.