Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3356226
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T02:29:21+00:00 2026-05-18T02:29:21+00:00

I know similar questions have been asked before, but I think my solution is

  • 0

I know similar questions have been asked before, but I think my solution is far simpler. Especially compared to Wikipedia.

Please prove me wrong!

If you have a tree with nodes that have the given data structure:

struct node
{
    node * left;
    node * right;
    node * parent;
    int key;
}

You could write a function like this:

node* LCA(node* m, node* n)
{
    // determine which of the nodes is the leftmost
    node* left = null;
    node* right = null;
    if (m->key < n->key)
    {
        left = m;
        right = n;
    }
    else
    {
        left = n;
        right = m;
    }
    // start at the leftmost of the two nodes,
    // keep moving up the tree until the parent is greater than the right key
    while (left->parent && left->parent->key < right->key)
    {
        left = left->parent;
    }
    return left;
}

This code is pretty straightforward and worst case is O(n), average case it is probably O(logn), especially if the tree is balanced (where n is the number of nodes in the tree).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T02:29:22+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 2:29 am

    Your Algorithm looks okay to me, at least I couldn’t think of anything better. Note that you don’t need the parent pointer; instead you can go down the tree starting from the root, and find the first node whose key lays between the two initial keys.

    However, your problem has nothing to do with the one Tarjan solved. First of all, you consider binary trees and he considers n-ary trees; but this is probably a detail. More importantly, you consider search trees, while Tarjan considers general trees (no ordering on the keys). Your problem is much simpler, because, depending on the key, you can guess where a certain node has to be in the tree.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know similar questions have been asked before but i think this is slightly
I know similar questions have been asked before, but I've tried many times and
I know that similar questions have been asked before, but I am very much
I know similar questions have been asked many times befor, but I think this
I know similar questions have been asked before but I haven't seen one where
I know similar questions (regarding cherry-picking) have been asked before, but I haven't really
I know similar questions have been asked before, but still things are not clear
I know similar questions have been asked before, but I can't find one that
I know similar questions have been asked and answered before but the truth is
I know that similar questions have been asked before but I have not been

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.