Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 679111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:13:26+00:00 2026-05-14T01:13:26+00:00

I know that __stdcall functions can’t have ellipses, but I want to be sure

  • 0

I know that __stdcall functions can’t have ellipses, but I want to be sure there are no platforms that support the stdarg.h functions for calling conventions other than __cdecl or __stdcall.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:13:26+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:13 am

    The calling convention has to be one where the caller clears the arguments from the stack (because the callee doesn’t know what will be passed).

    That doesn’t necessarily correspond to what Microsoft calls “__cdecl” though. Just for example, on a SPARC, it’ll normally pass the arguments in registers, because that’s how the SPARC is designed to work — its registers basically act as a call stack that gets spilled to main memory if the calls get deep enough that they won’t fit into register anymore.

    Though I’m less certain about it, I’d expect roughly the same on IA64 (Itanium) — it also has a huge register set (a couple hundred if memory serves). If I’m not mistaken, it’s a bit more permissive about how you use the registers, but I’d expect it to be used similarly at least a lot of the time.

    Why does this matter to you? The point of using stdarg.h and its macros is to hide differences in calling convention from your code, so it can work with variable arguments portably.

    Edit, based on comments: Okay, now I understand what you’re doing (at least enough to improve the answer). Given that you already (apparently) have code to handle the variations in the default ABI, things are simpler. That only leaves the question of whether variadic functions always use the “default ABI”, whatever that happens to be for the platform at hand. With “stdcall” and “default” as the only options, I think the answer to that is yes. Just for example, on Windows, wsprintf and wprintf break the rule of thumb, and uses cdecl calling convention instead of stdcall.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that I can use ubuntu server to host a website, but what
I know that for parsing I should ideally remove all spaces and linebreaks but
I know that you can use exclamation sign to bind array of simple types
I know that lambda expressions within loops can cause problems if they use local
i know that JCIFS not support ntlm version2 , mean i cannot use spring-nltm
I know that might sound like a stupid question since it's a trivial feature
I know that if I get an object, for example an NSArray, with a
I know that I should encodeURI any url passed to anything else, because I
I know that to save/restore matrix state you use standard push/pop operations. I haven't
I am trying to accomplish much the same thing as is being done here

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.