Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8689633
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T23:41:49+00:00 2026-06-12T23:41:49+00:00

I know that a certain object is only ever created as a temporary object

  • 0

I know that a certain object is only ever created as a temporary object (it’s a private member object within a library). Sometimes, that object is further initialized by chaining member functions together (TempObj().Init("param").Init("other param")). I would like to enable move construction for another object using that temporary instance, and so I was wondering if there was anything incorrect about return std::move(*this).

struct TempObj
{
    TempObj &&Member() { /* do stuff */ return std::move(*this); }
};

struct Foo
{
    Foo(TempObj &&obj);
};

// typical usage:
Foo foo(TempObj().Member());

Is it functionally equivalent to this?

struct TempObj
{
    TempObj(TempObj &&other);
    TempObj Member() { /* do stuff */ return *this; }
};

Foo foo(TempObj().Member());
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T23:41:51+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 11:41 pm

    With move semantics, you don’t want (or need) to return r-value references from functions … r-value references are there to “capture” unnamed values or memory addresses. When you return a r-value reference to an object that is in-fact an l-value from the standpoint of the caller, the semantics are all wrong, and you create the opportunity for needless surprises to arise when others are using your object’s methods.

    In other words, it would be better to orient your code to look like this:

    Foo foo(std::move(TempObj().Member()));
    

    and have TempObj::Member simply return a l-value reference. This makes the move explicit, and there are no suprises involved for someone using your object’s methods.

    Finally, no, it’s not functionally or semantically equivalent to your last example. There you are actually making a temporary copy of the object, and that copy will be an r-value object (i.e., an unamed object in this scenario) … since the assumption with r-value references is that the object is either an unamed value or object, and it can therefore be harmlessly modified by a function you pass it to that takes an r-value reference argument. On the other-hand, if you’ve passed a copy of an object to a function, then the function cannot modify the original. It will simply modify the referenced temporary r-value, and when the function exits, the temporary r-value copy of the object will be destroyed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that in Jsoup when you want to find a certain Element with
I would like to know the paths of certain files that a user is
I know that Phonegap has an event for back button, but it's only available
I know that Java have its own garbage collection, but sometimes I want to
I've implemented a content management system that deals with a certain kind of object,
I just learned that an object can have only one ID, so I'm not
I know that I can use templates to assume that certain classes used by
I know that this sort of question has been asked here before, but still
I know that if port 443 is open that means the remote host supports
I know that when I use range([start], stop[, step]) or slice([start], stop[, step]) ,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.