Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 113027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:38:15+00:00 2026-05-11T02:38:15+00:00

I know that calling a virtual method from a base class constructor can be

  • 0

I know that calling a virtual method from a base class constructor can be dangerous since the child class might not be in a valid state. (at least in C#)

My question is what if the virtual method is the one who initializes the state of the object ? Is it good practice or should it be a two step process, first to create the object and then to load the state ?

First option: (using the constructor to initialize the state)

public class BaseObject {     public BaseObject(XElement definition) {         this.LoadState(definition);     }      protected abstract LoadState(XElement definition); } 

Second option: (using a two step process)

public class BaseObject {     public void LoadState(XElement definition) {         this.LoadStateCore(definition);     }      protected abstract LoadStateCore(XElement definition); } 

In the first method the consumer of the code can create and initialize the object with one statement:

// The base class will call the virtual method to load the state. ChildObject o = new ChildObject(definition) 

In the second method the consumer will have to create the object and then load the state:

ChildObject o = new ChildObject(); o.LoadState(definition); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:38:16+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:38 am

    (This answer applies to C# and Java. I believe C++ works differently on this matter.)

    Calling a virtual method in a constructor is indeed dangerous, but sometimes it can end up with the cleanest code.

    I would try to avoid it where possible, but without bending the design hugely. (For instance, the ‘initialize later’ option prohibits immutability.) If you do use a virtual method in the constructor, document it very strongly. So long as everyone involved is aware of what it’s doing, it shouldn’t cause too many problems. I would try to limit the visibility though, as you’ve done in your first example.

    EDIT: One thing which is important here is that there’s a difference between C# and Java in order of initialization. If you have a class such as:

    public class Child : Parent {     private int foo = 10;      protected override void ShowFoo()     {         Console.WriteLine(foo);     } } 

    where the Parent constructor calls ShowFoo, in C# it will display 10. The equivalent program in Java would display 0.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 113k
  • Answers 113k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would not dive too deeply into design patterns for… May 11, 2026 at 10:06 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer ProcessExit should be sufficient. The DomainUnload event is designed to… May 11, 2026 at 10:06 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What you're doing is correct. There's possibly some more elegant… May 11, 2026 at 10:06 pm

Related Questions

I'm trying to write (what I thought would be) a simple bash script that
EDIT: minor fixes (virtual Print; return mpInstance) following remarks in the answers. I am
I recently posted a question about Azure... is it really an OS? I understand
I have the following situation: class A { public: A(int whichFoo); int foo1(); int

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.