Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6168169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T22:38:23+00:00 2026-05-23T22:38:23+00:00

I know that concurrent adds to an stl queue in c++ can cause issues,

  • 0

I know that concurrent adds to an stl queue in c++ can cause issues, and the way to solve this is adding a mutex lock around all add/remove calls.

But I am programming in Java at the moment, and I’m using BlockingQueue. The documentation only says that the thread that calls put/take on a BlockingQueue object gets blocked implicitly until there’s room to put/there’s something to take respectively. However, it does not mention anything about concurrent put/take calls. Would I need to protect these with a mutex lock?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T22:38:24+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 10:38 pm

    No, blocking-queues are thread-safe. From the docs:

    BlockingQueue implementations are thread-safe. All queuing methods achieve their effects atomically using internal locks or other forms of concurrency control

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that you can insert multiple rows at once, is there a way
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know that the MsNLB can be configured to user mulitcast with IGMP. However,
I have a .net windows service that works it's way through a queue of
I know that a Stateful EJB can be accessed concurrently by a particular client.
Does anyone know where I can find a system architecture for a site that
I'm trying to find one or more concurrent collections to use that I can
Just want to ask the gurus out there about this. I know that CSS
I know that default cron's behavior is to send normal and error output to
I know that |DataDirectory| will resolve to App_Data in an ASP.NET application but is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.