Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6549401
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T12:05:20+00:00 2026-05-25T12:05:20+00:00

I know that dynamic_cast have runtime check and therefor consider safer (can return null

  • 0

I know that dynamic_cast have runtime check and therefor consider safer (can return null pointer on failure) but slower then static_cast. but how bad is the overhead between the two?

should I realy consider use static_cast in loops for performance issues in regular large projects? or the difference is minor and only relevant for special real-time programs.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T12:05:21+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:05 pm

    Did you profile it?

    The rule is:

    • Use static_cast when you know that the target type is valid.
    • Use dynamic_cast when you’re not sure, and you need the program to look up the object’s runtime type for you.

    It’s as simple as that. All other considerations are secondary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an error that I can't fix ... I really don't know why
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know that you can insert multiple rows at once, is there a way
I know that |DataDirectory| will resolve to App_Data in an ASP.NET application but is
I know that the MsNLB can be configured to user mulitcast with IGMP. However,
I know that IList is the interface and List is the concrete type but
Do you have to pass delete the same pointer that was returned by new,
I know that it's legal to use dynamic_cast to do a cross-cast across a
I have a design based question where I want to avoid dynamic_cast but still
I have encountered the following problem which proved to me that I know far

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.