Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 954377
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:12:26+00:00 2026-05-16T00:12:26+00:00

I know that for multi part writes, I should be using transactions in nhibernate.

  • 0

I know that for multi part writes, I should be using transactions in nhibernate. However what about for simple read and writes (1 part) … I’ve read that it’s good practice to always use transactions. Is this required?

Should I do the following for a simple read ?? or can I just drop the transcaction part all togather ?

public PrinterJob RetrievePrinterJobById(Guid id)
{
    using (ISession session = sessionFactory.OpenSession())
    {
        using (ITransaction transaction = session.BeginTransaction())
        {
            var printerJob2 = (PrinterJob) session.Get(typeof (PrinterJob), id);
            transaction.Commit();

            return printerJob2;
        }
    }  
}

or

public PrinterJob RetrievePrinterJobById(Guid id)
{
    using (ISession session = sessionFactory.OpenSession())
    {
        return (PrinterJob) session.Get(typeof (PrinterJob), id);              
    }
}

What about for simple writes?

public void AddPrintJob(PrinterJob printerJob)
{
    using (ISession session = sessionFactory.OpenSession())
    {
        using (ITransaction transaction = session.BeginTransaction())
        {
            session.Save(printerJob);
            transaction.Commit();
        }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:12:27+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:12 am

    Best recommendation would be to always use a transaction. This link from the NHProf documentation, best explains why.

    When we don’t define our own
    transactions, it falls back into
    implicit transaction mode, where every
    statement to the database runs in its
    own transaction, resulting in a large
    performance cost (database time to
    build and tear down transactions), and
    reduced consistency.

    Even if we are only reading data, we
    should use a transaction, because
    using transactions ensures that we get
    consistent results from the database.
    NHibernate assumes that all access to
    the database is done under a
    transaction, and strongly discourages
    any use of the session without a
    transaction.

    (BTW, if you are doing serious NHibernate work, consider trying out NHProf).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I only know basic concepts for multi-threading, and I currently encounter a situation that
I know that lot of questions about HTML sanitizers have appeared in SO, but
I have a multi-part array that I want to grab a piece of and
I have a multi-part question: (1) Is there a good reason why Silverlight doesn't
I'm using the following java code to upload a multi-part image to an ASMX
I know that LIBSVM only allows one-vs-one classification when it comes to multi-class SVM.
I know that all of these will be compiled together into one file but
I know that VB offers many things to control it : SDK, API, COM,
i know that it may be difficult to see the actual problem without looking
I know that a powerset is simply any number between 0 and 2^N-1 where

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.