Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7833893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T12:57:41+00:00 2026-06-02T12:57:41+00:00

I know that gdb allows for an already declared variable to be set using

  • 0

I know that gdb allows for an already declared variable to be set using the set command.

Is it possible for gdb to dynamically declare a new variable inside the scope of a given function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T12:57:43+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 12:57 pm

    For C (and probably C++) code, that would be very hard, since doing so in most implementations would involve shifting the stack pointer, which would make the function’s exit code fail due to it no longer matching the size of the stack frame. Also all the code in the function that accesses local variables would suddenly risk hitting the wrong location, which is also bad.

    So, I don’t think so, no.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I set Emacs gdb so that it shows the most recent command
Stepping through C code in gdb using Eclipse, I noticed that for a variable
I know it is possible to remotely debug code using gdb's server mode and
I love using GDB withing emacs. And I most like the configuration that I
I am using g++ 4.1.2 and gdb 7.2 I am debugging code that uses
Also I know that anything that I create using alloc I have to release
Briefly: Does anyone know of a GUI for gdb that brings it on par
Does anyone know how to save gdb settings (like set print pretty on or
From this link gdb interpret memory address as an object we know that, if
I know that != is not equal, but what does it mean when you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.