Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 999985
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:26:24+00:00 2026-05-16T07:26:24+00:00

I know that I can access a constructor on another constructor like below: public

  • 0

I know that I can access a constructor on another constructor like below:

public Rectangle(int size) : this(size, size)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Square Constructor Called");
    //this(size,size); I want to access like this 
}

Is there a way to access it in the body of another constructor, instead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:26:25+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:26 am

    You can’t do that. The full justification is here, but in summary:

    In short, achieving the desired construction control flow is easy to do without adding the [the ability to call base constructors in arbitrary locations], and there’s no compelling benefit to adding the feature. No new interesting representational power is added to the language.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know that you can use a dummy int parameter on operator++ and operator--
I know that you can insert multiple rows at once, is there a way
I know that JTable can sort by a single column. But is it possible
I know that I can share files using Shared Folders in Virtual PC, but
I know that I can insert multiple rows using a single statement, if I
I know that you can run almost all Java in Dalvik's VM that you
I know that CSS can be used to control the presentation of (X)HTML in
I know that you can apply CSS in order to style objects in Flex
I know that I can use $('#myId').load('aPage.html'); to load a page into an element,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.