Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 993955
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T06:30:19+00:00 2026-05-16T06:30:19+00:00

I know that if I mark code as DEBUG code it won’t run in

  • 0

I know that if I mark code as DEBUG code it won’t run in RELEASE mode, but does it still get compiled into an assembly? I just wanna make sure my assembly isn’t bloated by extra methods.

[Conditional(DEBUG)]
private void DoSomeLocalDebugging()
{
   //debugging
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T06:30:20+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:30 am

    Yes, the method itself still is built however you compile.

    This is entirely logical – because the point of Conditional is to depend on the preprocessor symbols defined when the caller is built, not when the callee is built.

    Simple test – build this:

    using System;
    using System.Diagnostics;
    
    class Test
    {
        [Conditional("FOO")]
        static void CallMe()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Called");
        }
    
        static void Main()
        {
            CallMe();
        }
    }
    

    Run the code (without defining FOO) and you’ll see there’s no output, but if you look in Reflector you’ll see the method is still there.

    To put it another way: do you think the .NET released assemblies (the ones we compile against) are built with the DEBUG symbol defined? If they’re not (and I strongly suspect they’re not!) how would we be able to call Debug.Assert etc?

    Admittedly when you’re building private methods it would make sense not to include it – but as you can see, it still is built – which is reasonable for simplicity and consistency.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that this sort of question has been asked here before, but still
I know that you can mark a scala object as @serializable , but I
Suppose you have a module that you know is safe. You want to mark
I know that Phonegap has an event for back button, but it's only available
I know that this line of code will make the cell text-wrap: $objPHPExcel->getActiveSheet()->getStyle('D1')->getAlignment()->setWrapText(true); 'D1'
I know that Java have its own garbage collection, but sometimes I want to
Is there a way to mark certain parts of code so that they don't
I'd like to know how to get Subversion to change the name that my
I know that if port 443 is open that means the remote host supports
I know that when I use range([start], stop[, step]) or slice([start], stop[, step]) ,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.