Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 496721
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T05:42:46+00:00 2026-05-13T05:42:46+00:00

I know that if I use binary serialization with WCF I lose interopability. If

  • 0

I know that if I use binary serialization with WCF I lose interopability.

If I’m willing to live with this I was wonderinf if there is an efficiency benefit in using binary over Xml.

And if there are any other pros and cons that I have not mentioned above

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T05:42:47+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:42 am

    Yes – potentially a big one. XML serialized data is big compared with the binary equivalent. With binary, you lose readability and interoperability. You also lose the ability to host in IIS unless you are on Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista or higher.

    However, the performance gains if you are in a .NET to .NET scenario outweight these drawbacks in many situations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any real use for self modifying code ? I know that they
I know that you can use boost serialization to serialize to a text format
I know that you can use a dummy int parameter on operator++ and operator--
I know that I can use $('#myId').load('aPage.html'); to load a page into an element,
I know that I have to use: rdtsc. The measured function is deterministic but
I know that I am supposed to use delete [] after I use new
We know that a single application instance can use multiple cores and even multiple
I know that cursors are frowned upon and I try to avoid their use
I know that to find all the .h files I need to use: find
Does anyone know any good tool that I can use to perform stress tests

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.