Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4022834
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T10:31:30+00:00 2026-05-20T10:31:30+00:00

I know that objects are treated pretty much like singletons in scala. However, I

  • 0

I know that objects are treated pretty much like singletons in scala. However, I have been unable to find an elegant way to specify default behavior on initial instantiation. I can accomplish this by just putting code into the body of the object declaration but this seems overly hacky. Using an apply doesn’t really work because it can be called multiple times and doesn’t really make sense for this use case.

Any ideas on how to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T10:31:31+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:31 am

    Classes and objects both run the code in their body upon instantiation, by design. Why is this “hacky”? It’s how the language is supposed to work. If you like extra braces, you can always use them (and they’ll keep local variables from being preserved and world-viewable).

    object Initialized {
      // Initalization block
      {
        val someStrings = List("A","Be","Sea")
        someStrings.filter(_.contains('e')).foreach(s => println("Contains e: " + s))
      }
    
      def doSomething { println("I was initialized before you saw this.") }
    }
    
    scala> Initialized.doSomething
    Contains e: Be
    Contains e: Sea
    I was initialized before you saw this.
    
    scala> Initialized.someStrings
    <console>:9: error: value someStrings is not a member of object Initialized
           Initialized.someStrings
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two arrays of JavaScript Objects that I'd like to compare to see
I know that the static objects in .Net managed world are loaded in Loader
I know that you can apply CSS in order to style objects in Flex
I know that when a constructor fails, the completed member objects will be destroyed.
I am storing objects in a buffer. Now I know that I cannot make
I'm using python 3.1.1. I know that I can create byte objects using the
What are few commonly used Hidden Lists and Objects that we should know of
I know about the WebRequest and the WebResponse objects. The problem is that I
I have drawn an object on NSView subclass. How can the object know that
I know that I can iterate over an object's properties like this: for (property

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.