Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 47379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:06:49+00:00 2026-05-10T16:06:49+00:00

I know that this is somewhat subjective, but I wonder if there is a

  • 0

I know that this is somewhat subjective, but I wonder if there is a generally accepted standard for naming assemblies which contain some ‘core’ functions.

Let’s say you got a larger Projects, with Assemblies like

  • Company.Product.WebControls.dll
  • Company.Product.Net.dll
  • Company.Product.UserPages.dll

and you have a Bunch of ‘Core’ classes, like the Global Error Handler, the global Logging functionality etc.

How would such an assembly generally named? Here are some things I had in mind:

  • Company.Product.dll
  • Company.Product.Core.dll
  • Company.Product.Global.dll
  • Company.Product.Administration.dll

Now, while ‘just pick one and go on’ will not cause Armageddon, I’d still like to know if there is an ‘accepted’ way to name those assemblies.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:06:49+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:06 pm

    With .Net this is relatively easy to change, so I’d go with convenience.

    Fewer, larger, assemblies compile quicker than many small ones, so I’d start with your ‘core’ stuff as a namespace inside Company.Product.dll, and split it out later if you need to.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 70k
  • Answers 70k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer There is a meta tag you can use that will… May 11, 2026 at 12:49 pm
  • added an answer See this answer: Script all stored procedures in Management Studio… May 11, 2026 at 12:49 pm
  • added an answer Find the first row where there does not exist a… May 11, 2026 at 12:49 pm

Related Questions

I know that this is a simple question for PHP guys but I don't
I know that this is subjective and all, but still, can you provide some
I don't know if this is too specific a question, if that is possible,
This is a crude korn shell script that someone else wrote. I don't know
So I know it's considered somewhat good practice to always include curly braces for
I find that my program is searching through lots of lengthy strings (20,000+) trying
I have a SVN Repository at my main PC, to which only I have
Its prudent to break a long function into a chief function and helper functions.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.