Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:26:51+00:00 2026-05-11T07:26:51+00:00

I know that XP didn’t ship with a version of .NET Framework and I’m

  • 0

I know that XP didn’t ship with a version of .NET Framework and I’m fairly certain that .NET 2.0 shipped with Vista. My question is, will installing .Net 2.0 on XP also install support for .Net 1.1 applications as well? Also, is vista 1.1 compatible out of the box.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:26:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:26 am

    ‘Not really’ to the first question. .NET 1.1 is an independent framework compared to 2.0. They can happily sit side by side on the same machine. Vista does not include 1.1. If you are trying to use 2.0 to run 1.1 applications, there may be problems. Yes to the second question: It can be installed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We know that behind the scenes, the ASP.NET MVC framework will use reflection to
I didn't know that installing ruby is such a pain After lot of trouble
i didn't really know how to title this question, but here's a thing that
I know that you can create a textbox using ASP.NET that will automatically be
I know you can't use the character, tried ` instead and that didn't work,
I know that Visual Studio under debugging options will fill memory with a known
I know that title didn't make sense, Im sorry! Its hard to word what
If I didn't know that the sleep method on java.lang.Thread was static, how could
I know that it's a subject that can raise a lot of debate, but
I know that one of the differences between classes and structs is that struct

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.