Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 410543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T17:53:56+00:00 2026-05-12T17:53:56+00:00

I know that you have to do it like this: int * p; p

  • 0

I know that you have to do it like this:

int * p;
p = new int[10];

//use array

delete [] p;

Now my question is: Since it’s not explicitly stated, how is it possible that the correct amount of memory is freed? Do the OS keep track of the allocated memory and its starting address?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T17:53:56+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:53 pm

    The runtime library will keep track of allocated blocks of memory. It’s guaranteed to deallocate the block correctly, given the initial pointer returned by new.

    While this can be implemented in the OS itself (theoretically), it normally isn’t. What the OS keeps track of is the pages allocated to a process as a whole, not individual blocks allocated at this level of abstraction.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently have a table like this: Stuff ---------- StuffId identity int not null
I have a library that I would like to license and distribute. I know
I know that I have to use: rdtsc. The measured function is deterministic but
Now that I know C++ I want to get into desktop application that have
I know that primary keys based on Guids do not have the best performance
In C++, I can do something like this: int i[10] = new int[10]; int
I have a controller method in ASP.NET MVC that looks like this: public ActionResult
Does anyone know how sites that have a real-time feed of a lot of
I want to generate random numbers manually. I know that every language have the
I know that PHP doesn't yet have native Enumerations. But I have become accustomed

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.