Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 700427
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:29:47+00:00 2026-05-14T03:29:47+00:00

I know there are various good arguments preferring CSS positioning over table-based layouts. What

  • 0

I know there are various good arguments preferring CSS positioning over table-based layouts. What I’m wondering is whether the CSS model is complete (assuming a relatively modern browser) with respect to ALL of the capabilities of tables. Are there layouts that tables can achieve that are impossible or impractical with CSS?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:29:48+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:29 am

    I would switch to css based layouts if I could. The sematic arguments are correct, but there are practical considerations. Tables will:

    • absolutely prevent ‘float wrap’ where a div will fall to the next line because there isn’t enough space for it
    • give you same-height columns
    • allow dynamic layouts where widths and heights are not known until run-time
    • provide colspans and rowspans
    • reduce the number of SO questions asking how to do stuff without tables 🙂

    There are css display properties (table-cell, etc) which mimic some of this, but I don’t believe the support is widespread enough to use them yet (unless you can control your user’s browser selection).

    The site I work on requires competely dynamic column widths in the layouts. Multiple customers use the same site templates, and I have no idea what they will put into the menu or page header or content cells. (And no idea what they will find attractive, which is another issue…) Using a single outer table to lay out the main sections of the site allows the flexibility I need without worrying that a slightly-too-wide menu will push the main content box down to the next row, or that background colors won’t fill the required height.

    In a perfect (to me) world, we would have <table>s for tabular data, and another, nearly identical set of tags for layouts – call it <layout> (along with corresponding row and cell tags). Or, add a ‘mode’ attribute to the <table> tag – the values would be ‘data’ and ‘layout’ so that screen readers and search engines would know what to do. Maybe in html 6…

    Edit: I shoud add, regarding the ‘float wrap’ thing – there is a current question on SO with an answer that works pretty well here. It is not perfect, and too me it is too complicated, but it would resolve the problem in many cases.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 390k
  • Answers 390k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do it with the code: marshaller.setProperty("com.sun.xml.bind.namespacePrefixMapper", new NamespacePrefixMapper()… May 15, 2026 at 1:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It should be possible with dependency:unpack than you could bind… May 15, 2026 at 1:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not without using some collection of the objects. The simplest… May 15, 2026 at 1:01 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.