Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7942209
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T23:54:01+00:00 2026-06-03T23:54:01+00:00

I know this is not the best nor the most efficient way to find

  • 0

I know this is not the best nor the most efficient way to find prime numbers; However, I can’t seem to find the reason why 169 counts as a prime number (for smaller numbers it works OK as far as I’m concerned).

public static int checkPrime(int num, int i)
{
    if (i == num)
        return 1;

    else
    {
        if (num % i == 0)
            return 0;
        else
            checkPrime(num, i+1);

    }

    return 1;
}

Main Class:

        System.out.println("Type a number");
        number = reader.nextInt();

        if ((number % 10) % 2 == 0)
            result = 0;

        else
            result = checkPrime(number, 2);

        if (result == 1 || number == 2)
            System.out.println(number + " is a prime number");
        else
            System.out.println(number + " is NOT a prime number");
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T23:54:03+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 11:54 pm

    Replacing int by boolean for better expressiveness, and returning the value of the recursive call, your method looks like this:

    public static boolean checkPrime(int num, int i)
    {
        if (i == num)
            return true;    
        else
        {
            if (num % i == 0)
                return false;
            else
                return checkPrime(num, i+1);
        }
    }
    

    It still doesn’t work for num < 2, it’ll run until i overflows. So as your main prime checking function you can write something like:

    public static boolean checkPrime(int num)
    {
       if(num<2)
         return false;
       else
         return checkPrime(num, 2);
    }
    

    btw (number % 10) % 2 is equivalent to number % 2.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know this is not the proper way to do this, however I am
I know this sort of code is not best practice, but nevertheless in certain
I know this question is not really important.. however I've been wondering: Which of
Site . This code is not optimized nor is it the best method. If
I know this is not the only question out there, but I still couldn't
I know this is not programming related, but I have a scenario. Each video
Hey. I know this is not a 'refactor my code' site but I made
I know this might sounds not reasonable, and might be a bad design. But
Anyone know why this is not returning a value? Example $item2['data'] where it =
Does someone know why this is not a strict quine ? _0='_0=%r;print _0%%_0';print _0%_0

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.