Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I know this question may sound silly, but it happened. I put some statements in catch to handle the exception(that it should go to some screen) and it always used to go in that catch block. So I removed the try/catch so that my app crashes so that I could identify the exception. But, interestingly, it didn’t crash. Is it possible?
See if your method has a “throws XXXException” declaration. if true, that means the caller (or caller’s caller …. ) has catched the exception and handled it there.
If the method didn’t declare any exceptions to throw, that means the “exception” you catched is a “RuntimeException”, which could be thrown without declaration.
That’s the 2 scenarios where you won’t get an app crash.