Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 283851
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:24:31+00:00 2026-05-12T05:24:31+00:00

I know what serialization is , but to me, this is one term that

  • 0

I know what serialization is, but to me, this is one term that does not describe what it means.

Why do we call serialization serialization? What is it about converting objects to raw data (and inflating/deserializing, for that matter) lends itself towards anything that related to the term “serial”? Who coined this term and why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:24:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:24 am

    I think John Saunders is on the right track, the fact that data is sent to disk or over a network as a “stream” is almost certainly the origin of this term.

    Another way to think of it, however, is like this: The state of a program is spread all over memory, with pointers/links pointing all over the place. You have arrays, lists, trees, call stacks, heaps of allocated memory, etc., in no particular order.

    When you want to save some state, you cannot use much of the information in your program. For example, any pointer values or stack offsets (whether used directly or used internally by the language runtime, etc.) will likely not be valid the next time your program runs because the heap will have been used to allocate slightly different series of memory blocks. Saving these pointer values would be useless.

    To save some state, you have to “put your affairs in order” such that the information being saved is only that part that will be relevant later on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that Serialization (Serializable) is not available in the Micro Edition of Java.
Know of an OCAML/CAML IDE? Especially one that runs on Linux?
I know this might be a no-brainer, but please read on. I also know
To start, I know there are two kinds of JSON serialization currently built into
Know of any good libraries for this? I did some searches and didn't come
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know, I would have thought the answer was obviously no as well, but
Anyone know why only undirectional serialization is supported in the Linq designer? Consider the
Imagine I've got a data object that makes sense in an OO model, but
When processing XML by means of standard DOM, attribute order is not guaranteed after

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.