Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 617461
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:26:18+00:00 2026-05-13T18:26:18+00:00

I like the idea of extending on the client side classes that are data

  • 0

I like the idea of extending on the client side classes that are data contracts of WCF services using partial classes. But I encountered a problem that considerably spoils the party.

Imagine on the server side I have a class:

[DataContract]
public class SolidObject
{
    [DataMember]
    public Point Position { get; set; }
    [DataMember]
    public Size Size { get; set; }
}

On the client side I have a proxy class generated, which is used there in the business logic layer. According to the needs of the business logic I extend it this way:

public partial class SolidObject
{
    public Rect Bounds { get { return new Rect(Position.X - Size.Width / 2, Position.Y - Size.Height / 2, Size.Width, Size.Height); }}
}

Now I want to ensure that anytime either Position or Size changes, then Bounds chage event is invoked. It is easy to do by the code:

PropertyChanged += (sender, e) =>
    {
        if ((e.PropertyName == "Position") || (e.PropertyName == "Size")) PropertyChanged.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs("Bounds"));
    };

The question is where the good place to put this code in is.

If objects weren’t created by a service call, I’d put it into the constructor. But WCF services ignore constructors on the client side, see constructor not showing up in my WCF client, serialization problem?.

Now, right after service response my program searches through data contract hierarchy, gets desired objects and adds event handlers. But I don’t think it’s a right thing.

So I’m interesting in where to it is better to do or, maybe, reasoning that the whole approach should be changed. Any ideas appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:26:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:26 pm

    You could use the [OnDeserlialized] attribute to insert a method that gets called after deserizlization.

    public partial class SolidObject
    {
        public Rect Bounds
        {
            get
            {
                return new Rect(Position.X - Size.Width / 2, Position.Y - Size.Height / 2, Size.Width, Size.Height);
            }
        }
    
        [OnDeserialized]
        public void Initialize(StreamingContext streamingContext)
        {
            PropertyChanged += (sender, e) =>
            {
                if ((e.PropertyName == "Position") || (e.PropertyName == "Size"))
                    PropertyChanged.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs("Bounds"));
            };
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I really like the idea of automatic binding generation like SWIG does. But it
I've been using virtualenv lately while developing in python. I like the idea of
I like the MVVM idea of a RelayCommand that's exposed by the ViewModel. That's
I have a html like this: The idea is that divs are floated left
This probably sounds like a terrible idea at first glance, but here is my
I have a client that wants a custom importer. The data source is an
I like the idea of abstracting CellControllers in a heterogeneous UITableView as suggested by
Hi I'm new to Linux and I really like the idea of writing and
My idea is like if there is a exist file , add the filename
sound like a terrible idea? Yeah I thought so too. Needless to say im

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.