Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5933785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T15:01:22+00:00 2026-05-22T15:01:22+00:00

I like the LLVM idea. To be honest, I do not much care for

  • 0

I like the LLVM idea. To be honest, I do not much care for Ruby, I’d rather use Perl, or Python, or …. ( it’s a long list ).

Nothing personal, it’s a great language, but I just prefer others.

However, Ruby has so many good ideas that I might need to STFU and just learn it, if nothing else to debug the tools.

Before I do so, I am wondering if there is a practical and usable implementation of Ruby done using the LLVM toolchain?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T15:01:22+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 3:01 pm

    Well, you have llvmruby, RubyComp and more important, Rubinius, but MacRuby also uses LLVM for “optimization passes, JIT and AOT compilation of Ruby expressions”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got a project where I am not able to use LLVM optimizing because
I am trying to use llvm to implement a simple, dumb c-like language. And
While trying to compile an LLVM IR, like this llc main.ll -o main.s &&
Like the title says, I'm wondering if the use of WebClient is the proper
Like in topic. It is possible to do it? Or make something to use
I'm toying around with the LLVM C++ API. I'd like to JIT compile code
I used to use OpenC++ ( http://opencxx.sourceforge.net/opencxx/html/overview.html ) to perform code generation like: Source:
I'm working with LLVM + Clang now. I use the ASTUnit to build-up the
I would like to know which classes clang uses to represent C++(not C) source
I'd like to use clang on my Xcode iPhone project. However this is the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.